Reggie Fils-Am Supports Blockchain Tech and Play-to-Own Games



Let’s kick off this easy, obvious joke now: Reggie’s body is ready for the blockchain. Lots of fun, moving on… but yes, apparently the former Nintendo COO and President of America is a fan of blockchain technology and the games themselves to play, with the caveat that it “makes sense for the player.” “

At last month’s SXSW festival in Austin, Texas, Reggie Fils-Aim talked about his career, time with Nintendo, and the things he’s done since retiring in 2019. and as seen Nintendo LifeHe also spent some time talking about blockchain technology and its future in games.

When asked about his thoughts on the current rise of NFTs, cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, Fils-Ame shared that he is a “believer” in the technology and prefers to call it a “compelling” technology. He further explained that it can be used to help power “play-to-own” experiences in games, allowing players to sell digital items they have earned or created in video games. .

“I also believe in the concept of ‘play-to-own’ within video games,” Fils-Aim said. “And I say this as a player where I may have invested 50 hours in a game, a hundred hours in a game… there are some games that I have invested 300 hours in a game. And when I set out to do something else, so wouldn’t it be nice to earn from what I’ve made?”

Fils-Aimé then set an example, suggesting that many people would be interested in buying it. Animal Crossing: New Horizons island and how he wants to be able to “monetize it”.

“Blockchain technology embedded in the code and development will enable me to do this,” he said. “So I believe in technology and where it’s going.”

Read more: Crypto Gaming ‘Landlords’ Upset They Can’t Exploit All Players Leaving

Possibly realizing that his interest in blockchain technology could be viewed as a bad omen, Fils-Aimé quickly stated that any type of blockchain-like technology needed to be “understandable to the player”. Will be

“It cannot simply be a view by the developer that [finds] Is it ‘interesting’ or is it a way for them to make more money as a ‘growth unit’, he said. “In the end, it should be good for the player. But I see an opportunity.”

While Fils-Aimé may get its selling opportunity animal cross Island via Blockchain, the ability for players to sell digital items in video games to other players, existed long before Blockchain, or NFTs. Even if there weren’t environmental issues with blockchain technology or if it wasn’t often associated with scams, rug pulling, and other suspicious situations, the simple reality is this: NFTs and blockchain need to be included in video games. There is no companies to provide players with the ability to sell or buy in-game digital goods. It’s also highly unlikely that Nintendo, Fils-Ame’s former employer, will ever allow blockchain technology to be in any game released on the Switch or future Nintendo consoles.

Sorry, Reginator. But, hey, he can always sell his one worthless NFT animal cross Island If he really wants to monetize his time spent playing video games using a terrible technology that most gamers hate.

Source



Related News

These two easy hacks will make your selfies so much better

TikTok has proven to be invaluable when it comes to life hacks, and now we can combine these two tricks for taking better selfies on the list.

Now you can see and talk to the Google Assistant on your Nest Hub Max

No need to say 'Hey Google' to talk to the Assistant on your Smart Display

Google Wallet returns as your new wallet to carry your cards, passports, keys and more on your mobile

Leaked last April, the new app google-wallet it is already a reality. Within the framework of Google I/O 2022, the company has announced that very soon the

Spelljammer a “new” setting for Dungeons & Dragons

Wizards of the Coast has announced the release of his "new" setting: Spelljammer. The announcement, in addition to having hit the entire fan base of this

Appeals court allows Texas social media law to take effect

A Texas law aimed at punishing social media companies if they "censor" users will apply for now, a three-person panel of federal appeals court judges ruled